ACR Appropriateness Criteria Staging and Follow-Up of Ovarian Cancer. Journal Article

Local Library Link: Find It @ Loyola

Authors: Kang, SK; Reinhold, C; Atri, M; Benson, CB; Bhosale, PR; Jhingran, A; Lakhman, Y; Maturen, KE; Nicola, R; Pandharipande, PV; Salazar, GM; Shipp, TD; Simpson, L; Small, W; Sussman, BL; Uyeda, JW; Wall, DJ; Whitcomb, BP; Zelop, CM; Glanc, P
Article Title: ACR Appropriateness Criteria Staging and Follow-Up of Ovarian Cancer.
Abstract: In the management of epithelial ovarian cancers, imaging is used for cancer detection and staging, both before and after initial treatment. The decision of whether to pursue initial cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer depends in part on accurate staging. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (and chest where indicated) is the current imaging modality of choice for the initial staging evaluation of ovarian cancer. Fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT and MRI may be appropriate for problem-solving purposes, particularly when lesions are present on CT but considered indeterminate. In patients who achieve remission, clinical suspicion for relapse after treatment prompts imaging evaluation for recurrence. Contrast-enhanced CT is the modality of choice to assess the extent of recurrent disease, and fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT is also usually appropriate, as small metastatic foci may be identified. If imaging or clinical examination confirms a recurrence, the extent of disease and timing of disease recurrence then determines the choice of treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Journal Title: Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X; 1546-1440
Publisher: Unknown  
Date Published: 2018
LUC Authors
  1. William Small
    181 Small
Related LUC Article