The Impact of Academic Facility Type and Case Volume on Survival in Patients Undergoing Curative Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Journal Article

Local Library Link: Find It @ Loyola

Authors: Bajaj, A; Martin, B; Bhasin, R; Hentz, C; Block, A. M.; Harkenrider, M. M.; Solanki, A. A.
Article Title: The Impact of Academic Facility Type and Case Volume on Survival in Patients Undergoing Curative Radiation Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Abstract: PURPOSE: Bladder-preserving curative radiation therapy (RT) has been established as an excellent treatment option for select patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, some clinicians have concerns that good outcomes are only achievable at high-volume facilities (HVFs) and academic centers (ACs), questioning successful reproducibility of curative RT at smaller centers. This study sought to determine whether treatment at ACs or HVFs was associated with better overall survival (OS) than treatment at nonacademic centers or lower-volume facilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of National Cancer Database patients (n=2763) with cT2 to cT4 N0 M0 transitional cell MIBC who received curative RT (60-70 Gy) with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the instantaneous hazard of death as a function of univariate and multivariate patient characteristics and clinical measures. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that academic facility type was significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.98; P=.02) whereas higher case volume was not associated with improved survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.92-1.01; P=.15). Multivariate analysis showed no differences in OS for treatment at ACs versus nonacademic centers (HR, 0.94; 95% CI 0.84-1.06; P=.31) or HVFs versus lower-volume facilities (HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.94-1.04; P=.60). The 2-year OS rate was 54.5% (95% CI 52.5%-56.4%), and the 5-year OS rate was 28.9% (95% CI 27.0%-30.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Although some providers are cautious about offering curative RT at all centers, this large hospital-based study suggests that facility type and volume are not significantly associated with OS for patients undergoing curative RT after we account for other clinically relevant risk factors. The results of this study demonstrate that curative RT in the treatment of MIBC may be considered for patients regardless of facility type or volume.
Journal Title: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
Volume: 100
Issue: 4
ISSN: 1879-355X; 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc  
Journal Place: United States
Date Published: 2018
Start Page: 851
End Page: 857
Language: eng
DOI/URL:

S0360-3016(17)34166-4
Notes: LR: 20180227; CI: Copyright (c) 2017; JID: 7603616; 2017/08/25 00:00 [received]; 2017/11/21 00:00 [revised]; 2017/11/27 00:00 [accepted]; 2018/02/28 06:00 [entrez]; 2018/02/28 06:00 [pubmed]; 2018/02/28 06:00 [medline]; ppublish