Development, implementation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board: Strategies for maximizing success. Journal Article

Local Library Link: Find It @ Loyola

Authors: Matthews, AK; Newman, S; Anderson, EE; Castillo, A; Willis, M; Choure, W
Article Title: Development, implementation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board: Strategies for maximizing success.
Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to describe the formation, operation, and evaluation of a Community Engagement Advisory Board (CEAB) that serves as a resource of the University of Illinois at Chicago's (UIC) Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS). Methods: Current CEAB roles and functions, operating procedures for research consultations and program evaluation strategies were described. Investigators receiving a consultation from 2009 to 2017 (n = 91, response rate 78%) were surveyed via an online survey immediately after the consultation and at 12-month follow-up. Results: Overall, CEAB members were viewed as having sufficient information (92%) and expertise (79%) to provide consultation. Satisfaction levels with the specific consultation received and the overall consultation service were high. The majority of investigators indicated that they would come back to the CEAB for a future consultation, if needed, and would recommend a consultation to others (93% and 96%, respectively). At 12-months, 87% of respondents indicated they had implemented at least some of the recommendations received and 93% said that the consultation influenced their subsequent research. Conclusions: Data from recent annual evaluations highlight the benefits of CEAB for consulting investigators. Our model can be used to inform the development of future CEAB boards.
Journal Title: Journal of clinical and translational science
Publisher: Unknown  
Date Published: 2018